Open source performance testing tools comparison The article presents the solutions for load and performance testing in order to help specialists analyze the maximum capacity of their projects in terms of simultaneous requests. It will be interesting to both individuals who design web projects and IT specialists who, in their work, often need to test the server capacity.
We will take a look at the best open source tools designed to select the one that suits your requirements.
LoadNinja – Best for load testing with real browsers at scale
LoadNinja helps users diagnose web and API performance issues. It is simpler to use than conventional load testing tools and uses real browsers, which delivers a more accurate representation of load.
Creating performance tests via record and playback enhanced with AI can save around 60% of time vs traditional tools, and also reduces time maintaining tests as the application changes. Using real browsers at scale to generate load gives you the most accurate representation of load. Test results reflect true end-user experience and allow you to quickly diagnose bottlenecks and performance issues. The tool was designed with ease of use in mind, and is accessible to users of all skill levels.
Tool costs starting from $239/month for 100 virtual users. They also offer a free 14-day trial.Visit Website
WAPT – Employs a universal performance test design approach by recording real-life web sessions from a browser or a mobile application
WAPT lets users design or run tests locally or in the cloud. Users are enabled to create tests using a browser or a mobile application; employ remote, distributed and cloud-based testing; launch server and database performance monitoring; and more.
Some of the most exemplary elements of the software are the usefulness of auto-parameterization of most dynamic values, the extensibility via Javascript, and point-and-click recording capabilities.
The WAPT interface, as seen from the associated screenshot, comes across quite dated in the color, look, feel, and even text orientation. For those used to modern tech UI, it may be a bit of an eyesore; thus, they lost a few points per the UX review criteria.
WAPT starts at $700 and has a free trial.Visit Website
WebLOAD – Test with powerful recording and scripting, correlation, drag-and-drop building blocks, parameterization, and response validation
WebLOAD generates a test script in JavaScript, with the flexibility to add a wide range of protocols and easily extend to additional protocols as needed. The recording is transparent and automatic with any web technology, including HTTP/HTTPS (SSL, TLS) and more.
This tool does particularly well with building any simulated load for load and performance testing in an intuitive and easy way. Additionally, the play and record features are useful for tracking results.
As the only tool with no pricing information available, WebLOAD lost some points in cost transparency, meaning their review results for Value for Cost dropped a bit.
WebLOAD offers pricing upon request and has a free trial.Visit Website
Neotys Neoload – Design code-less load performance test scripts for large, complex applications using a graphical user interface
Neotys Neoload helps to design, maintain and run performance tests as code and analyze results within continuous integration pipelines using pre-packaged plugins for CI/CD tools and the NeoLoad API. Easily set up testing resources as needed.
This tool has a clean, colorful, and strategically organized user interface that makes returning to the software for each task a pleasure. Thus, they scored well in the UX segment of the evaluation process.
One critique of this software to be wary of is that the charging mechanism on the cloud is not atomic in nature and has a dependency on a local machine. Additionally, the project gets harder to manage as the script grows.
Neotys Neoload starts at $6024/month and has a free 30-day trial.Visit Website
BlazeMeter – A shift-left testing platform for enterprises that need API, GUI functional & performance testing, mock services, and API monitoring
BlazeMeter allows for Selenium functional testing with no coding necessary. Simulate thousands or millions of virtual users from over 55 geo-locations, leveraging your favorite open source tools: Apache JMeter, Selenium, Gatling, Grinder, Locust and more.
This tool scores well in the Features – Reporting and Analytics segment of the evaluation criteria, as status report types and assertion types are very useful when creating test scripts. Reporting and graph features are very accurate, making them a key component of the software.
A downside of this tool is that Blazemeter does not integrate well or easily with Jmeter if you started with or intend to incorporate that tool at all.
BlazeMeter starts at $99/month and has a freemium version of the software.Visit Website
Load Impact – LoadImpact, soon to rebrand as k6 Cloud, is a cloud service used to load test the performance of websites, apps, and APIs
LoadImpact is a cloud service to load test the performance of websites, apps, and APIs that has specifically focused on API load testing in the new k6.io app, with a completely revamped Test Builder. Plus, they have an improved browser session recorder and an improved results page.
A standout component of this software is it’s easy to support of various ‘cl technologies’. Additionally, the reporting, graphs, and pictures are aesthetically pleasing and very readable.
This tool would benefit in some better help sections/training documents in order to outline the different components of the software and website. They lost a few marks in the evaluation for Usability but this certainly isn’t a deal-breaker, as many aspects of the tool are intuitive anyways.
Load Impact starts at $99/month and has a free trial.Visit Website
Gatling
Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Read More »
Locust
Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. It is intended for load-testing websites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle. Read More »
Tsung
Tsung is an open-source multi-protocol distributed load testing tool. It can be used to stress HTTP, WebDAV, SOAP, PostgreSQL, MySQL, LDAP, MQTT, and Jabber/XMPP servers. Read More »
Siege
Siege is an HTTP load testing and benchmarking utility. Siege supports basic authentication, cookies, HTTP, HTTPS and FTP protocols. It lets its user hit a server with a configurable number of simulated clients. Read More »
Httperf
Httperf is a tool for measuring web server performance. It provides a flexible facility for generating various HTTP workloads and for measuring server performance. Read More »
Taurus
Although not specifically related to Perf testing, Taurus provides an automation-friendly framework for continuous testing, including functional and performance. Read More »
Artillery
Artillery is a modern, powerful & easy-to-use load testing and functional testing toolkit. Use it to ship scalable applications that stay performant & resilient under high load. Read More »
Goad
Goad takes full advantage of the power of Amazon Lambdas for distributed load testing. You can use goad to launch HTTP loads from up to four AWS regions at once. Each lambda can handle hundreds of concurrent connections, able to achieve peak loads of up to 100,000 concurrent requests. Read More »
More Options
Apache JMeter
7.6Rating15Reviews537Words/Review18,368Views15,323ComparisonsPopular Comparisons
Apache JMeter vs Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional
Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeterWe appreciate that the solution is free to use, as an open-source tool.Very user-friendly and easy to use.
Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional7.7Rating10Reviews481Words/Review12,486Views9,215ComparisonsPopular Comparisons
Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional vs Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud
Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional vs Apache JMeterThe solution can handle a huge amount of workloads, it’s quite scalable.The most important feature for us is that it supports a lot of protocols because we support all of them, including HTTP, FTP, mainframe, and others.
Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise7.7Rating7Reviews1,009Words/Review5,179Views3,936ComparisonsPopular Comparisons
Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional
Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs Micro Focus LoadRunner CloudWe have a centralized delivery team and we are able to meet enterprise requirements, which include different types of protocols that are involved, including scripting. The technology supports that and enables us to have a wider range of testing. Enterprise-level testing is something that we are satisfied with.
Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud8.0Rating6Reviews805Words/Review5,229Views3,565ComparisonsPopular Comparisons
Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud vs Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional
Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud vs Micro Focus LoadRunner EnterpriseThe TruClient feature is the most valuable for us. An application with testing can only be scripted using TruClient, so it’s part web-based, but it also has its own protocol combined with HTTP and HTML. So many other tools do not recognize this specific proprietary protocol. Using TruClient, we can still create scripts that cover everything that we need to cover.
ReadyAPI7.7Rating6Reviews542Words/Review6,759Views4,870ComparisonsPopular Comparisons
ReadyAPI vs BlazeMeterIt’s easy to learn how to use it.When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don’t use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing.
Tricentis NeoLoad8.2Rating5Reviews500Words/Review6,328Views3,720ComparisonsPopular Comparisons
Tricentis NeoLoad vs Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional
Tricentis NeoLoad vs Apache JMeterThe stability is okay. The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it. I didn’t have to search Google or watch YouTube videos. In just 15 to 20 minutes, I was able to understand the tool.
Conclusion
A Web performance testing tool is an application program used to check how well an application performs under different load scenarios. A performance testing tool, when applied with the collected results of load testing, can help you improve your site’s response times and help find issues in your site’s capacity to handle large amounts of traffic.